Art Prize 2009 Cheat Sheet

Is your brain numb from Art Prize? Are you worried that paper airplanes, a man with a monkey or pine trees might win Art Prize? Here's a list assembled by our Super Computer Laboratory that will be sure to make you feel like an art aficionado.


This list is in random order:


Yong-Ho Ji - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/916

John Douglas Powers - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/2491

Pascal Haudressy - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/1796

Brian Dettmer - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/4368

J. Thomas Pallas - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/2877

Young Kim - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/3899

Eric Daigh - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/1384

Joshua Rizer - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/2123

Paul Kaiser - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/1991

Jenny Carroll - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/525

Diane Whitehead Lorick - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/4466

Shay Church - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/1925

Mark Rumsey - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/131

Plamen Yordanov - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/1573

Norman Mooney - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/1575

Matthew Schenk - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/2016

Claire Watkins - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/4112

Daan Hoekstra - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/3217

John Merigian - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/2363

Israel Davis - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/3302

Eric Zamuco - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/2222

Sun K. Kwak - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/1428

Ran Ortner - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/1584

Jay Pingree - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/2620

Armin Mersmann - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/2885

Shelly Klein - http://www.artprize.org/artist/id/75


Just vote these artists up on http://www.artprize.org and let your friends stand in wonder of your artistic prowess. :)

10 + 1 Reasons for GM's Failure

I'm not a huge fan of top "X" lists that permeate Twitter but I thought this was appropriate. 10 + 1 reasons GM is failing. Can you name these models? Can you tell the difference. What is the issue? See below.

One through ten (all GM products):







Plus One: Product Differentiation (or lackthereof)

Three Ways to Fix My Feathered Friend

Twitter is getting a *lot* of press lately, from the over-hyped race between Ashton Kutcher and CNN to Oprah's first tweet and the first tweet from space. There is a lot that I like about Twitter. For one thing, it allows me to sift through enormous amounts of interesting information by trusting the recommendations of the people I follow. It also has expanded my network of "friends" (intentional air quotes).

But in my opinion there are a couple of nagging issues with the twittersphere:

1. Twitter shouldn't be a popularity contest. I watch my followers like a hawk, but it's not to watch my level of tweetcred grow. In fact, I do the opposite. I visit every person that follows me. I read their tweets and decide if I should keep them (and not follow, for now), keep and follow, or block.

More often than not, I go for the block. Since I'm in marketing and use marketing #hashtags, I get a lot of riff-raff. Get rich quick schemes, attractive swimsuit models with names like Bob Johnson (I don't remember seeing Bob in the latest SI), or people with amazing systems for 'getting 3500 followers in 20 minutes'. But is that the point?

I say tend to your garden, don't let it grow out of control. Even though I manage my followers, I am still shocked by the number of people that I deem legitimate that get suspended for suspicious activity. So the point is, does size matter? I don't think so. I'd rather have a few hundred solid followers than a few thousand garbage users.

2. Can I see your passport? As I stated before, I'm deleting affiliate marketers left and right who in some way think the will make money off the latest craze. How about a rating system? There are people who I read religiously no matter what they post. They already have an imaginary five star rating in my mind. Let's make it official. If someone follows me and 500 people have rated them as a quality user, I'm more likely to welcome them into my circle of friends. It would also help quickly weed out the gaff. Of course, affiliate marketers will try to stay ahead of the game by establishing rating farms, but you can never stop people from doing bad things. However, we could make it much more difficult and add a lot of friction to the process!

3. Truth in Advertising. I think Twitter gets a bad rap. I was not an early adopter of Twitter. I had heard many stories about people tweeting about mundane life. "I ate an apple.", "I'm tired.", etc. I don't find this to be a problem ( maybe I weed these people out?). My problem with Twitter is that it is touted as a communication tool. I define communication as two way, and I just don't find Twitter to be good for that (yet?). Twitter is not "Facebook on Steroids" as I often hear it described. Instead, I think of it more as a community of extroverts. It's like a large crowd of people talking AT each other, OVER each other, but not necessarily TO each other.

It's also a veritable wasteland of top ten lists. "Top Ten CSS Cheats", "Ten Ways to Improve Communication", "Ten Interesting Sinks". Believe me, I click on a ton of links, and look at a lot of top ten lists. I like them. But will I still be interested a year from now? How about two years?

It makes me wonder, as Twitter continues to grow, will it blossom into a true communication vehicle, or will the popularity contest wear thin? Will we run out of top ten lists or will we find better ways to share information (and conversation) in a more meaningful way? Only time will tell, and until then I'll continue to weed out fake followers, read way too many top ten lists (with pleasure) and continue to try and see the forest for the trees but in the back of my mind I still debate whether Twitter is the new frontier, or if it will itself be relegated to some sort of kitschy "It came from the 2000's" countdown list? "Remember when we used to 'tweet'? What were we thinking?!"

We Know What You Did Last Night

A buddy and I were joking about new pricing models on the web. We quickly landed on blackmail. :) This is a fictitious press release for a fictitious company. But in an increasingly bi-polar world where we are both paranoid about our privacy yet tweet about what we ate for lunch, the what-if's are endless. Possible?

Side note: This domain is currently available. Let me know if you need our top-secret algorithm. :)

New Website To Offer Safe Surfing for Some, Unfortunate News for Others: Suspicious Web Surfing Activities No Longer a Personal Secret

Grand Rapids, Mich – April 16, 2009 – We Know What You Did Last Night™ (www.wkwydln.com) is a free service intended to limit the objectification of women and men online. Using a proprietary algorithm that’s patent- pending), WKWYDLN collects data about a person’s Internet-browsing behavior.

“It’s actually a wicked brilliant design,” said Erickson Leftelm, CTO and technology evangelist, WKWYDLN.com “We call it our passive/active system. By passively collecting data through a large network of online ad affiliates, we can effectively track traffic patterns and filter millions of page views per hour,” Leftelm said.

The information is then filtered and tagged into distinct categories. The active system constantly traverses the web, mapping what they describe as “digital thumbprints” it detects on blogs, social networking services (such as Facebook and Twitter) as well as hundreds of other well-trafficked sites.

“We spent several years perfecting this technology. The lines between public and private lives have been blurred” said George Forest, CMO and head decency analyst. He added, “by cross-referencing multiple sites, we can build a pretty complete profile of a person including a spouse, child or parent’s contact information.”

Information from the passive/active system is cross-referenced and if suspicious behavior is detected, the real power of the system kicks in. “In-house, we like to call it the ‘10AM Fire Alarm’” Leftelm added with a slight grin. “We’ve built a very robust communication system that is already connected to Facebook, Twitter, Linked In and sooner or later, Myspace.”

Using WKWYDLN’s advanced profiling system, it can notify friends, relatives and loved ones of the improprieties. “We consider this the next wave of social networking. We call it eIntervention™. Our whole mission is to let loved ones know what is going on after dark so that they can confront the offender and say ‘hey, we know what you are doing, and you should stop’” said Forest. “If we don’t stop it now, what will the world look like in 5 or 10 years? Honestly, I’m doing it for my children, and more importantly, all children.” Before researching this venture, Forest had never even heard of some of the subject matter people view in the privacy of their own homes. “I didn’t even know badunkadunk was a word, let alone what it meant. Now I reluctantly consider myself an expert, and we’re going to let the world know what you are looking at!”


We Know What You Did Last Night™ will be free-to-all, but that does not mean they don’t intend to generate revenue. “We actually have a two-pronged approach to get in the black as quickly as possible.” The first approach is through a subscription service called myBad™. “Simply put, myBad™ allows someone to pay a small yearly subscription fee to opt-out of our eIntervention™ service.” Forest said.

“Even the most innocent person can stumble upon some pretty unsavory sites. We created the myBad™ opt-out service so people can quickly login to our site, and not experience unnecessary Facebook notifications, tweets or emails to their spouse and friends. It’s all about control”. Forest thinks pricing will fall somewhere in the ten to twenty dollar range, “but honestly, in our testing, once someone receives an eIntervention™ they seem willing to pay almost anything to opt-out!” he added with a chuckle.

The second factor in reaching profitability fast is going to be accomplished through cost savings.
“The great thing about social networking is that word spreads fast. We don’t really need to advertising in traditional methods. Social media is booming, and we intend to spread the word virally, not through a huge advertising push”, Forest said. “One of the other ways we plan on staying lean is through our distribution of CPU utilization. Through our testing and research we found that most of our suspicious traffic, oddly enough, happens between the hours of 10:00pm and 2:00am”. So in effect, data collection and filtering happens during the night, while the eIntervention™ system works during the day. “Without even trying, we effectively doubled our CPU capabilities, lowering our hard costs.”

A soft launch is expected sometime in May and Leftelm expects they will be running at full capacity in June. “Early estimates are that we’ll send approximately 500,000 unique eInterventions™ a night” he added. At that rate they expect to clear $100 million in revenue within the first 8 months of operation. “This is the real deal. We’re coming out of the gates quickly” said Forest. Plans are already in the works to integrate their technology into the latest Mobile devices. “With GPS widely available in almost every new mobile phone, we see a huge market in the mobile world” added Leftelm. “Ultimately, it is about personal accountability.” Forest said before going into a meeting with potential partners.

Way Right or Way Wrong

In advertising the goal is to make memorable ads. That means either really good ads or really bad ads. You'll remember both. It's mediocre that will get you in trouble. Crispin + Porter has done a really good job of making memorable Burger King ads (I think "Whopper Freakout" was a stroke of genius). So is their new Spongebob ad "way right" or "way wrong"? Doesn't matter. You'll remember it for years to come. :)

Job Seekers - Mind Your brand!

When most people think of a brand, we often think of a large corporation (Starbucks, Target, etc.) who pumps millions of dollars into brand awareness. But most job seekers (especially recent college graduates) need to learn something very important- you have a brand identity, and you need to protect it at all costs (unless you want to be serving latte's at one of the aforementioned companies while drowning in debt).

There is a good chance that anyone under the age of 25 vaguely remembers a time when they were not socializing online. Most people have Facebook or Myspace accounts. A large number of people blog or tweet about the seemingly mundane tasks we all do every day. We post photos, respond to friends, joke, brag and generally carry on as if we live in a bubble that only our closest friends care about. But the fact of the matter is, the web is not a bubble, and if you're not careful, that totally drunk, half naked picture of you in Cancun will end up in the most unlikely hands; mine.

And why does it matter? Because *I* am most likely hiring *you*.

In a world where privacy rights are vehemently protected and protested, you may have fallen victim to the largest interview flaw in your life. I read your Facebook profile.

Not only that, I know exactly what you thought of me and how you thought the interview went. I know if you have other job opportunities, how much time you have before you have to sleep on a friends sofa, and, by following your social networking activities, I can make my own judgment on whether you are reliable, hard-working, trustworthy, etc. I've done my homework. Well, actually, you did my homework. I read your tweets. I went to your half-finished website (maybe it was a class project?) and visited all of your links. And I did it all in ten minutes.

Your brand identity is looking pretty bad right now, and you don't have any pro-active PR to make me think you are perfect candidate for the job.

What I see is that one of your favorite websites is Adbusters.org where I get smacked with the proclamation:

"We are a global network of culture jammers and creatives working to change the way information flows, the way corporations wield power, and the way meaning is produced in our society".
Whether you like it or not, your brand now reads: "anti-capitalist rabble-rouser bent on changing the way you run business".

My recommendations?

1. If you are actively looking for a job right now, the damage may already be done. Google does a great job indexing the web, and your life. Type your name into Google and see what comes up. Anything incriminating? Well you're probably too late (I can always check cached pages).

2. Be sure to lock down your Facebook account. Make sure the public can see as little as possible and take down the profile picture of you and the beer bong. Myspace? Delete your account, isn't that for children? :)

3. Make sure your tweets are appropriate. You may want to keep your posts to what you're eating or watching. Don't carry out your life drama online (until you get the job).

4. If you have a website, make sure your contents and links are vanilla at best. You don't want to ace an interview only to lose it because your political, religious or social views are different (even if you aren't a radical, you never know what is going to rub someone the wrong way).

Mind your Brand. In this world, it is not just about your resume and your list of accomplishments. You need to treat yourself like a business. Just like a fast food restaurant strives to be clean (or at least to be perceived by the public as clean), you need to protect your identity as if everything on the Internet is part of the collective work that is your resume.

Game Changer

Buzz that is usually reserved for the video game industry's largest event, E3, was in overdrive at this year's Gaming Developer's Conference (GDC). Gaming startup Onlive (http://www.onlive.com) stole the show with its announcement (and inpressive demonstration) of it's cloud enabled gaming subscription service. In brief, instead of using a gaming console (XBox 360, PS3, Wii) or PC to process the enormous amount of data necessary for today's games, Onlive would leave the heavy lifting to its network of computers. Your only requirement to play? A subscription, a speedy internet connection, and a controller (a modem-sized box will also be available if you plan on playing it on your TV). As you traverse the system menus or are playing a game, your controller movements are uploaded to virtual machines and your thumb gyrations are processed. "Pictures" of your game are then sent back at 60 frames per second with no latency. Incredible? Yes! Impossible? Maybe?

I've read up on the requirements of such a service. The hardware required would be massive. The compression software, ground-breaking. Yet if it can be done, the technology will not only rattle the cages of console makers Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo. It will also be a game changer for HP, Dell and Apple.

Imagine a day in the not-so distant future when the desktop computer will consist of nothing more than a keyboard, mouse and a display. Your CPU will be "in the cloud". Your files? The same. And imagine what it does for software as a service. Need Photoshop? Run it. Want to switch operating systems? Just a quick configuration change. All of your data, configuration and personalization settings are ready and waiting whenever you need it. Just login and go.

Pricing models for software could be diverse; pay-to-play, monthly subscriptions, or outright purchases are all possible ways of monetizing the model. And of course, an overall user fee or monthly subscription for CPU access and storage.

I'll leave it to the software engineers to debate the compression algorithms and computing power needed to make Onlive a reality, but one thing is obvious. A new era of computing and gaming is right around the corner, and my iMac is a little nervous.